Fox News Poll: Majority Approves Tax Cut Agreement
Published December 16, 2010 | FoxNews.com
A majority of American voters approve of the proposed deal to preserve Bush-era tax cuts agreed on between President Obama and Republican leaders in Congress, and voters are more likely to think the compromises made by both sides represent how things “should” work in Washington.
A Fox News poll released Thursday found that by 68 to 26 percent, most voters approve of the compromise deal.
Moreover, approval is across the board: 69 percent of Republicans, 68 percent of Democrats and 67 percent of independents endorsed the deal.
When asked what they would do if forced to choose between either continuing the tax cuts for all Americans or letting taxes increase for all Americans, 73 percent of voters said they would continue the tax cuts for all. That includes 83 percent of Republicans, 73 percent independents and 64 percent of Democrats.
Among other things, the agreement between Obama and Republicans allows the Bush-era tax cuts to continue for all Americans for two more years and also extends unemployment benefits. The Senate overwhelmingly passed the package on Wednesday. The House is scheduled to vote Thursday afternoon.
Obama received criticism, including by many in his own party, for “caving” on extending the tax cuts to the wealthy. Yet overall, voters generally backed the president’s position. About one third -- 32 percent -- thinks Obama “compromised too much on tax cuts,” while 50 percent say his agreement with Republicans is the way things “should” work in Washington.
The results are more mixed on the other side. Thirty-seven percent of voters think Republican leaders “compromised too much on spending,” while 41 percent say their deal with the president is how things “should” work.
Both Democrat and Republican voters have similar feelings about how their side handled the negotiation: 43 percent of Democrats think President Obama compromised “too much.” That compares to 44 percent of Republicans who said the same of their party leaders.
Overall, more people think President Obama (44 percent) has a clear plan for the country than think Republicans in Congress do (28 percent). Still, majorities don’t think the president (52 percent) or Republicans (63 percent) have a clear plan.
By more than two-to-one, the poll found voters think continuing the tax cuts is more likely to help (42 percent) than hurt (18 percent) the economy. Thirty-six percent say it won’t make a difference.
Views are much more mixed on extension of unemployment benefits for the long-term unemployed: 35 percent think they will help the economy and 40 percent think they will hurt. Another 21 percent say extending the benefits won’t make a difference to the economy.
Meanwhile, by a wide 18 percentage-point spread, more voters think giving unemployment benefits to the long-term unemployed discourages them from trying to find work.
The national telephone poll was conducted for Fox News by Opinion Dynamics Corp. among 900 randomly chosen registered voters from December 15 to December 16. The poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points for the total sample.
Most Now Say Obama Not Keeping Promises
Even while voters favored the tax-cut compromise, a 59 percent majority thinks President Obama is “drifting off course” from the promises he made during the presidential campaign. Some 28 percent think he is keeping his promises.
This is a reversal of earlier opinion. In April 2009, when Obama had been in office for about 100 days, 57 percent said he was keeping his promises and 27 percent said drifting off course.
Among Democrats, 48 percent think the president is keeping his promises, compared to 82 percent who felt that way in 2009.
Among independents the difference over time is much sharper: 25 percent think the president is keeping his promises now and 58 percent disagree. In 2009, 50 percent said he was keeping his promises and 28 percent said he was drifting off course.
Other highlights from the poll:
-- Overall, saving for retirement (35 percent) and paying bills (34 percent) are the biggest financial worries voters say they face right now. For 11 percent the top concern is keeping their job, while 9 percent said “all” were equally worrisome.
There are clear differences among groups on their concerns. For those living in households with an annual income of less than $50,000, the biggest worry is paying bills. For higher income households, it’s saving for retirement. Young people as well as seniors are more likely to put paying bills as the top worry, while for those aged 30-64 the key issue is saving for retirement.
-- Just how to do that saving is also a matter of widespread opinion. When asked the best place to invest $10,000, more say just put it in the bank (34 percent) rather than put the money in stocks (20 percent) or gold (14 percent). And about 16 percent think the best place is right under the mattress.
Thursday, December 16, 2010
The will of the American People on Healthcare.....REPEAL IT or substantially CHANGE IT!
Fox News Poll: Most Voters Say Repeal or Change Health Care Law
Published December 16, 2010 | FoxNews.com
The number of American voters who like the new health care law remains small -- most want it repealed or changed, according to a Fox News poll released Thursday.
A 16 percent minority of voters like the new health care law and think it should be implemented as is. Most voters, though, don’t like it.
Over half would either repeal the law entirely (27 percent) or repeal parts of the new law (32 percent). Some 15 percent would go the other direction and expand the law.
Current views are unchanged from earlier polling. In mid-October, 17 percent said they would leave the law as it is, 27 percent said repeal it altogether, another 27 percent said repeal parts of the law and 19 percent said they would like lawmakers to expand it (11-13 October 2010).
Democrats are most likely to support the law as it currently stands (28 percent) or want lawmakers to expand it (26 percent). Even so, 29 percent of Democrats want parts of the law repealed, and 4 percent say repeal it entirely.
Almost all Republicans think the law should be repealed -- either completely (48 percent) or at least in part (32 percent). Seven percent say expand it and 9 percent say leave it as is.
For independents, 30 percent think Congress should repeal it entirely, 37 percent say repeal parts of the law, 12 percent say it should be expanded and 11 percent would keep it in its current form.
Meanwhile, the new poll found voters agree with substance of the Virginia federal judge’s ruling on Monday that the health care bill goes too far by requiring all Americans buy health insurance. While 28 percent think the government can force
Americans who can afford it to have health insurance, most voters -- 69 percent -- disagree.
Large majorities of Republicans (85 percent) and independents (75 percent) think the government cannot require Americans to have health insurance. Among Democrats, views are split: 45 percent think the government can mandate insurance, while 50 percent say it can’t.
The national telephone poll was conducted for Fox News by Opinion Dynamics Corp. among 900 randomly chosen registered voters from December 15 to December 16. The poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points for the total sample.
Published December 16, 2010 | FoxNews.com
The number of American voters who like the new health care law remains small -- most want it repealed or changed, according to a Fox News poll released Thursday.
A 16 percent minority of voters like the new health care law and think it should be implemented as is. Most voters, though, don’t like it.
Over half would either repeal the law entirely (27 percent) or repeal parts of the new law (32 percent). Some 15 percent would go the other direction and expand the law.
Current views are unchanged from earlier polling. In mid-October, 17 percent said they would leave the law as it is, 27 percent said repeal it altogether, another 27 percent said repeal parts of the law and 19 percent said they would like lawmakers to expand it (11-13 October 2010).
Democrats are most likely to support the law as it currently stands (28 percent) or want lawmakers to expand it (26 percent). Even so, 29 percent of Democrats want parts of the law repealed, and 4 percent say repeal it entirely.
Almost all Republicans think the law should be repealed -- either completely (48 percent) or at least in part (32 percent). Seven percent say expand it and 9 percent say leave it as is.
For independents, 30 percent think Congress should repeal it entirely, 37 percent say repeal parts of the law, 12 percent say it should be expanded and 11 percent would keep it in its current form.
Meanwhile, the new poll found voters agree with substance of the Virginia federal judge’s ruling on Monday that the health care bill goes too far by requiring all Americans buy health insurance. While 28 percent think the government can force
Americans who can afford it to have health insurance, most voters -- 69 percent -- disagree.
Large majorities of Republicans (85 percent) and independents (75 percent) think the government cannot require Americans to have health insurance. Among Democrats, views are split: 45 percent think the government can mandate insurance, while 50 percent say it can’t.
The national telephone poll was conducted for Fox News by Opinion Dynamics Corp. among 900 randomly chosen registered voters from December 15 to December 16. The poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points for the total sample.
Just what I said Yesterday!
This is exactly what I said yesterday before this meeting took place...these companies are all liberal and/or already in bed with the government!...not a group that would challenge anything Obama might want to do!...Again just Obama windowdressing....not substance...what else is new!
Corporations represented at summit with Obama already cozy with administration
By Amanda Carey Updated: 12:53 PM 12/16/2010
On Wednesday, President Obama met with a group of about 20 CEOs in a five-hour long summit, reportedly in an attempt to soothe the souring relationship between big business and big government. From almost all accounts, the “charm offensive” was successful.
By the end, Boeing CEO John McNerney is reported to have said, “We all wanted to move beyond the talk that made this confrontational environment. We made our apologies.” Honeywell International CEO David Cote said after the meeting, “Government is the enabler of business…Government and business need to work together.”
What Cote did not mention is that his company has already been working closely with the Obama Administration, and was a major beneficiary of the Recovery Act — as were many of the other companies represented. According to Recovery.gov, Honeywell received over $44 million in grants from the Department of Energy (DOE) for renewable energy initiatives.
Honeywell also raked in more than $24 million in a variety of different government contracts from agencies like the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Department of Defense.
Also notable is the fact that many of the corporations represented – General Electric (GE), Duke Energy, NextEra Energy, Dow Chemical and PepsiCo – are current members of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP).
USCAP is a lobbying coalition of businesses and environmental groups that lobby heavily for energy legislation like cap and trade. USCAP, in fact, takes credit for getting the recent Waxman-Markey bill passed in the House last year.
NextEra and Duke also received about $200 million apiece from the DOE to develop a smart grid – a popular idea among environmentalists pushing for more energy efficient products.
Noticeably absent from yesterday’s meeting were CEOs from Caterpillar, John Deere, and ConocoPhillips. All of those companies withdrew from USCAP within the last year.
John Doerr from the Silicon-Valley venture capitalist firm Kleiner Perkins was also in attendance. But as the Daily Caller previously reported, Doerr has successfully lobbied the Obama Administration the last two years for policies supporting green initiatives that support companies he has major financial stakes in.
Doerr, whose business partners include former Vice President Al Gore, depends on government policies for the success of the start-up firms focused on green technology that he has invested in. the mutually-beneficial relationship prompted one energy scholar to tell theDC recently, “they’re co-dependent and loving it!”
“Obama’s CEO Summit was pure propaganda,” Tom Borelli of the Free Enterprise Project told theDC. “The meeting was billed as an effort to mend tensions between the business community and the president when in reality many of the CEO attendees are acting as an arm of the Obama Administration.”
He continued: “The meeting was not to establish relationships but a rally to keep CEOs pushing for the Obama’s radial policy agenda.”
During the meeting, President Obama reportedly focused on encouraging the executives to begin investing and hiring again. He began the meeting by saying, “…I want to dispel any notion that we want to inhibit your success…We want to be boosters because when you do well, America does well.”
Corporations represented at summit with Obama already cozy with administration
By Amanda Carey Updated: 12:53 PM 12/16/2010
On Wednesday, President Obama met with a group of about 20 CEOs in a five-hour long summit, reportedly in an attempt to soothe the souring relationship between big business and big government. From almost all accounts, the “charm offensive” was successful.
By the end, Boeing CEO John McNerney is reported to have said, “We all wanted to move beyond the talk that made this confrontational environment. We made our apologies.” Honeywell International CEO David Cote said after the meeting, “Government is the enabler of business…Government and business need to work together.”
What Cote did not mention is that his company has already been working closely with the Obama Administration, and was a major beneficiary of the Recovery Act — as were many of the other companies represented. According to Recovery.gov, Honeywell received over $44 million in grants from the Department of Energy (DOE) for renewable energy initiatives.
Honeywell also raked in more than $24 million in a variety of different government contracts from agencies like the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the Department of Defense.
Also notable is the fact that many of the corporations represented – General Electric (GE), Duke Energy, NextEra Energy, Dow Chemical and PepsiCo – are current members of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP).
USCAP is a lobbying coalition of businesses and environmental groups that lobby heavily for energy legislation like cap and trade. USCAP, in fact, takes credit for getting the recent Waxman-Markey bill passed in the House last year.
NextEra and Duke also received about $200 million apiece from the DOE to develop a smart grid – a popular idea among environmentalists pushing for more energy efficient products.
Noticeably absent from yesterday’s meeting were CEOs from Caterpillar, John Deere, and ConocoPhillips. All of those companies withdrew from USCAP within the last year.
John Doerr from the Silicon-Valley venture capitalist firm Kleiner Perkins was also in attendance. But as the Daily Caller previously reported, Doerr has successfully lobbied the Obama Administration the last two years for policies supporting green initiatives that support companies he has major financial stakes in.
Doerr, whose business partners include former Vice President Al Gore, depends on government policies for the success of the start-up firms focused on green technology that he has invested in. the mutually-beneficial relationship prompted one energy scholar to tell theDC recently, “they’re co-dependent and loving it!”
“Obama’s CEO Summit was pure propaganda,” Tom Borelli of the Free Enterprise Project told theDC. “The meeting was billed as an effort to mend tensions between the business community and the president when in reality many of the CEO attendees are acting as an arm of the Obama Administration.”
He continued: “The meeting was not to establish relationships but a rally to keep CEOs pushing for the Obama’s radial policy agenda.”
During the meeting, President Obama reportedly focused on encouraging the executives to begin investing and hiring again. He began the meeting by saying, “…I want to dispel any notion that we want to inhibit your success…We want to be boosters because when you do well, America does well.”
"Dirty" Harry Reid again doesn't care how the American People feel!
Harry Reid doesn't understand why Conservatives are willing to give up earmarks....MAYBE BECAUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT NO EARMARKS, NO PORK, NO WASTEFUL SPENDING....But Harry Reid doesn't care what the American people want....it's still all about "me" for the Democrats.....Harry Reid to totally out of touch and all he wants to do is pay back those that bought votes for him.
Reid says Earmarks are their job!
"Dirty" Harry Reid is senile!....does he not even listen to the President...he wants no earmarks, but he's too weak to come out and take a stand on it now....he says he's concerned about the deficit, but he's going to allow this $1.1 Trillion omnibus bill.....What a mess the Democrats are making....I hope the public is watching and will remember...I hope those that voted for "Dirty" Harry in Nevada are regretting their vote right now!
Preparing for a final showdown on the massive $1.1 trillion spending bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid defended the thousands of earmarks in the measure as the basic function of Congress.
"That's our job. That's what we're supposed to do," Mr. Reid, Nevada Democrat, said as he chastised fellow senators who, while having requested pork-barrel spending earlier this year, are now decrying their inclusion in the spending bill.
Mr. Reid challenged those senators to voluntarily agree to strip their own earmarks out of the bill, and said so far, nobody has taken him up on that.
Earmarks are just one of the fights that have broken out over the 1,924-page spending bill, which Democrats unveiled this week and have said they'll soon push to have lawmakers vote on.
As of noon, official copies of the bill were still not available in the Senate's document room, though versions were available online and in the Congressional Record.
The earmarks and other unrequested spending items have put President Obama on the spot, too. He had earlier vowed to veto any bill that contained money for an alternate engine program for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, but on Thursday Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said the bloated funding bill was better than simply extending last year's spending measure.
"A year-long continuing resolution, as far as I'm concerned, for the Department of Defense is the worst of all possible worlds," Mr. Gates said, referring to the stopgap measure likely to result if Congress fails to pass the massive spending bill. "The omnibus is not great, but it beats a year-long continuing resolution."
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, has vowed to work against the bill — in which he had nearly 50 earmarks — and instead introduced a short-term stop-gap bill to keep the government funded through next year.
On the Senate floor on Thursday he repeatedly hefted an unofficial, printed-out version of the spending bill, and compared the scene to last year about this time, when the Capitol was also enveloped in a snowstorm and a massive bill — in that case the health care legislation — was dropped on senators' desks.
"This bill is so enormous, it took the government printing office two days to print it. It spends more than half a billion dollars a page," he said.
Republicans will paralyze the Senate floor for 50 hours by forcing clerks to read every single paragraph of the 1,924-page, $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill.
Senate clerks are expected to read the massive bill in rotating shifts around the clock — taking breaks to drink water and pop throat lozenges — to keep legislative business on track, according to a Democratic leadership aide.
The bill is so long that it took the Government Printing Office two days to print it.
The Senate is currently debating the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty. It is expected to take up the omnibus spending bill on a separate and parallel track later Thursday.
If Republicans follow through on their threat, legislative business couldn’t resume until late Saturday in order to give the staff enough time to read the bill aloud, according to a Democratic leadership estimate.
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), the Senate Republican Steering Committee chairman, vowed not to back down.
“If they bring this up, they’re going to read it. It’ll take them a day or two to read it,” DeMint said on Fox News. “Again, we’re trying to run out the clock. They should not be able to pass this kind of legislation in a lame-duck Congress.”
Snow began blanketing the Capitol on Thursday and the forecast calls for more on Sunday, when the Senate is expected to be in session. It's a scenario that recalls the hectic finish to the healthcare reform debate last year.
“Well, here we go again,” said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) on the Senate floor Thursday. “All of this is eerily familiar to anyone who remembers the healthcare debate. We’ve even got snow in the forecast — just like last year, when we voted on the healthcare bill in a blizzard.”
McConnell has offered as an alternative a one-page continuing resolution that would fund the government through Feb. 18 at current levels.
Meanwhile, Sen. Jon Kyl (Ariz.), the lead GOP negotiator on START ratification, argued the Senate should not be trying to rush the treaty and spending bill through the Senate simultaneously.
“To suggest that we can dual-track an issue as important as the funding of the government with this almost 2,000-page, $1 trillion-plus bill at the same time that we are seriously debating the START treaty is a fantasy,” Kyl told reporters Wednesday.
Kyl said Republicans want to offer amendments and “there’s no way they could adequately be considered in the time that we have.”
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.), however, rejected the possibility of delaying START until January or February.
“If you have new senators coming in, you can hear the cries right now: ‘We haven’t had time to do this, we don’t know the treaty backwards and forwards, we have to take hearings, we have to have more briefings,’” Kerry told reporters Thursday, noting that the Senate has spent a year and a half reviewing the treaty.
“The really appropriate question is not ‘Why not wait?’ It’s ‘Why delay?’” Kerry said.
Kerry said the treaty will enhance national security, noting that 150,000 American troops will be in harm’s way and arguing the Senate should do its part to protect the country in the days before Christmas.
Kerry said Democrats are ready to vote on the treaty and predicted there would be 67 votes to ratify if Republican centrists are given enough time to debate and offer amendments.
The Massachusetts Democrat said his party would move to hold a vote on the treaty in the next few days when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) determines it’s appropriate. He noted that Republicans have circulated about 15 amendments.
Kerry also rejected the prospect of shelving the omnibus to allow colleagues to focus on the START debate.
“Absolutely not,” he said. “There’s a reason the omnibus is on the floor today — because the Republicans have delayed everything."
“The irony, the hypocrisy of us sitting here with them standing up and saying 'Oh my Gosh, it’s the last minute,' ” he added. “It’s the last minute because they haven’t let us do anything. The game plan is usually to keep preventing things from happening.”
Preparing for a final showdown on the massive $1.1 trillion spending bill, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid defended the thousands of earmarks in the measure as the basic function of Congress.
"That's our job. That's what we're supposed to do," Mr. Reid, Nevada Democrat, said as he chastised fellow senators who, while having requested pork-barrel spending earlier this year, are now decrying their inclusion in the spending bill.
Mr. Reid challenged those senators to voluntarily agree to strip their own earmarks out of the bill, and said so far, nobody has taken him up on that.
Earmarks are just one of the fights that have broken out over the 1,924-page spending bill, which Democrats unveiled this week and have said they'll soon push to have lawmakers vote on.
As of noon, official copies of the bill were still not available in the Senate's document room, though versions were available online and in the Congressional Record.
The earmarks and other unrequested spending items have put President Obama on the spot, too. He had earlier vowed to veto any bill that contained money for an alternate engine program for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, but on Thursday Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said the bloated funding bill was better than simply extending last year's spending measure.
"A year-long continuing resolution, as far as I'm concerned, for the Department of Defense is the worst of all possible worlds," Mr. Gates said, referring to the stopgap measure likely to result if Congress fails to pass the massive spending bill. "The omnibus is not great, but it beats a year-long continuing resolution."
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, has vowed to work against the bill — in which he had nearly 50 earmarks — and instead introduced a short-term stop-gap bill to keep the government funded through next year.
On the Senate floor on Thursday he repeatedly hefted an unofficial, printed-out version of the spending bill, and compared the scene to last year about this time, when the Capitol was also enveloped in a snowstorm and a massive bill — in that case the health care legislation — was dropped on senators' desks.
"This bill is so enormous, it took the government printing office two days to print it. It spends more than half a billion dollars a page," he said.
Republicans will paralyze the Senate floor for 50 hours by forcing clerks to read every single paragraph of the 1,924-page, $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill.
Senate clerks are expected to read the massive bill in rotating shifts around the clock — taking breaks to drink water and pop throat lozenges — to keep legislative business on track, according to a Democratic leadership aide.
The bill is so long that it took the Government Printing Office two days to print it.
The Senate is currently debating the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty. It is expected to take up the omnibus spending bill on a separate and parallel track later Thursday.
If Republicans follow through on their threat, legislative business couldn’t resume until late Saturday in order to give the staff enough time to read the bill aloud, according to a Democratic leadership estimate.
Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), the Senate Republican Steering Committee chairman, vowed not to back down.
“If they bring this up, they’re going to read it. It’ll take them a day or two to read it,” DeMint said on Fox News. “Again, we’re trying to run out the clock. They should not be able to pass this kind of legislation in a lame-duck Congress.”
Snow began blanketing the Capitol on Thursday and the forecast calls for more on Sunday, when the Senate is expected to be in session. It's a scenario that recalls the hectic finish to the healthcare reform debate last year.
“Well, here we go again,” said Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) on the Senate floor Thursday. “All of this is eerily familiar to anyone who remembers the healthcare debate. We’ve even got snow in the forecast — just like last year, when we voted on the healthcare bill in a blizzard.”
McConnell has offered as an alternative a one-page continuing resolution that would fund the government through Feb. 18 at current levels.
Meanwhile, Sen. Jon Kyl (Ariz.), the lead GOP negotiator on START ratification, argued the Senate should not be trying to rush the treaty and spending bill through the Senate simultaneously.
“To suggest that we can dual-track an issue as important as the funding of the government with this almost 2,000-page, $1 trillion-plus bill at the same time that we are seriously debating the START treaty is a fantasy,” Kyl told reporters Wednesday.
Kyl said Republicans want to offer amendments and “there’s no way they could adequately be considered in the time that we have.”
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.), however, rejected the possibility of delaying START until January or February.
“If you have new senators coming in, you can hear the cries right now: ‘We haven’t had time to do this, we don’t know the treaty backwards and forwards, we have to take hearings, we have to have more briefings,’” Kerry told reporters Thursday, noting that the Senate has spent a year and a half reviewing the treaty.
“The really appropriate question is not ‘Why not wait?’ It’s ‘Why delay?’” Kerry said.
Kerry said the treaty will enhance national security, noting that 150,000 American troops will be in harm’s way and arguing the Senate should do its part to protect the country in the days before Christmas.
Kerry said Democrats are ready to vote on the treaty and predicted there would be 67 votes to ratify if Republican centrists are given enough time to debate and offer amendments.
The Massachusetts Democrat said his party would move to hold a vote on the treaty in the next few days when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) determines it’s appropriate. He noted that Republicans have circulated about 15 amendments.
Kerry also rejected the prospect of shelving the omnibus to allow colleagues to focus on the START debate.
“Absolutely not,” he said. “There’s a reason the omnibus is on the floor today — because the Republicans have delayed everything."
“The irony, the hypocrisy of us sitting here with them standing up and saying 'Oh my Gosh, it’s the last minute,' ” he added. “It’s the last minute because they haven’t let us do anything. The game plan is usually to keep preventing things from happening.”
"Bite Me" Biden....Biden To Republican Opposition: "Get Out Of The Way"
All I have to say to Joe Biden is "Bite Me"....the Republicans should insist they read EVERY word of this treaty...if the roles were reversed the Dems would require it...this is a BAD Treaty...it make America weaker not stronger.
RealClearPolitics - Video - Biden To Republican Opposition: "Get Out Of The Way"
RealClearPolitics - Video - Biden To Republican Opposition: "Get Out Of The Way"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)